Fracture mechanics characterisation of the WWER-440 reactor pressure vessel beltline welding seam of Greifswald Unit 8


Fracture mechanics characterisation of the WWER-440 reactor pressure vessel beltline welding seam of Greifswald Unit 8

Viehrig, H.-W.; Schuhknecht, J.

WWER-440 second generation (V-213) reactor pressure vessels (RPV) were produced by IZHORA in Russia and by SKODA in the former Czechoslovakia. The surveillance Charpy-V and fracture mechanics SE(B) specimens of both producers have different orientations. The main difference is the crack extension direction which is through the RPV thickness and circumferential for ISHORA and SKODA RPV, respectively. In particular for the investigation of weld metal from multilayer submerged welding seams the crack extension direction is of importance. Depending on the crack extension direction in the specimen there are different welding beads or a uniform structure along the crack front. The specimen orientation becomes more important when the fracture toughness of the weld metal is directly determined on surveillance specimens according to the Master Curve (MC) approach as standardised in the ASTM Standard Test Method E1921. This approach was applied on weld metal of the RPV beltline welding seam of Greifswald Unit 8 RPV. Charpy size SE(B) specimens from 13 locations equally spaced over the thickness of the welding seam were tested. The specimens are in TL and TS orientation.
The fracture toughness values measured on the SE(B) specimens with both orientations follow the course of the MC. Nearly all values lie within the fracture toughness curves for 5% and 95% fracture probability. There is a strong variation of the reference temperature T0 though the thickness of the welding seam, which can be explained with structural differences. The scatter is more pronounced for the TS SE(B) specimens. It can be shown that specimens with TS and TL orientation in the welding seam have a differentiating and integrating behaviour, respectively. The statistical assumptions behind the MC approach are valid for both specimen orientations even if the structure is not uniform along the crack front. By comparison crack extension, JR, curves measured on SE(B) specimens with TL and TS orientation show only minor differences within the mean variation.

Keywords: reactor pressure vessel steel; welding seam; surveillance programme; specimen orientation; fracture toughness; Master Curve concept

  • Lecture (Conference)
    34th MPA-Seminar and VGB-Symposium "Materials and Components Behaviour in Energy & Plant Technology", 09.-10.10.2008, Stuttgart, Deutschland
  • Contribution to proceedings
    34th MPA-Seminar and VGB-Symposium "Materials and Components Behaviour in Energy & Plant Technology", 09.-10.10.2008, Stuttgart, Deutschland
    Proceedings 34th MPA-Seminar and VGB-Symposium "Materials and Components Behaviour in Energy & Plant Technology", Stuttgart: MPA Stuttgart

Permalink: https://www.hzdr.de/publications/Publ-11627