A systematic review on the use of quantitative imaging to detect cancer therapy adverse effects in normal-appearing brain tissue


A systematic review on the use of quantitative imaging to detect cancer therapy adverse effects in normal-appearing brain tissue

Petr, J.; Hogeboom, L.; Nikulin, P.; Wiegers, E.; Schroyen, G.; Kallehauge, J.; Chmelik, M.; Clement, P.; Nechifor, R. E.; Fodor, L.-A.; de Witt Hamer, P.; Barkhof, F.; Pernet, C.; Lequin, M.; Deprez, S.; Jancalek, R.; Mutsaerts, H. J.; Pizzini, F. B.; Emblem, K. E.; Keil, V. C.

Cancer therapy for both central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS tumors has been previously associated with transient and long-term cognitive deterioration, commonly referred to as ‘chemo fog’. This therapy-related damage to otherwise normal-appearing brain tissue is reported using post-mortem neuropathological analysis. Although the literature on monitoring therapy effects on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well-established, such macroscopic structural changes appear relatively late and irreversible. Early quantitative MRI biomarkers of therapy-induced damage would potentially allow to take these treatment side-effects into account and pave the way towards a more personalized treatment planning.
This systematic review (PROSPERO number 224196) provides an overview of quantitative tomographic imaging methods, potentially identifying the adverse side-effects of cancer therapy
in normal-appearing brain tissue. Sixty-six studies were obtained from the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Studies reporting changes in normal-appearing brain tissue using MRI, PET, or SPECT quantitative biomarkers, related to radio-, chemo-, immuno-, or hormone therapy for any kind of solid, cystic, or liquid tumor were included. The reviewed studies were assessed for risk of bias using a modified QUADAS-2 tool, of which findings were summarized. For each imaging method, this review provides the methodological background, and the benefits and shortcomings of each method from the imaging perspective. Finally, a set of recommendations is proposed to support future research.

Involved research facilities

  • PET-Center

Permalink: https://www.hzdr.de/publications/Publ-33109